It was
certainly unfortunate and heinous the act of terror committed by Muslim
extremists against the French weekly Charlie Hebdo on January.
No form of
religion or ideology can be imposed or defended by violence because this is an
aggression against free will, the basic principle of human life.
Only God, who
is absolutely just and omniscient, can use violence to defend the righteous; in
extreme cases of oppression and spiritual contamination by the wicked, as it happened
in the early history of the Jewish people.
Jesus twice
rebuked the use of violence by his disciples, to defend him. The first time was
when he crossed the Samaritan territory, in his way to Jerusalem, and was denied
hospitality there. When James and John asked permission to destroy that
village, He said that He had not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them.
(Luke 9:56)
The second time
was when he was arrested, on the orders of Jewish priests and elders. One of
his disciples, angrily, hurts the servant of the high priest. Jesus then heals
the man and says, "Put away your sword, those who use the sword will die
by the sword.. " (Matthew 26:52)
In the case of
religious extremism, typical of some Muslim sects, the religious principles of
Islam are distorted, which has led to the oppression and murder of many who
oppose their wicked doctrine.
Such cases of
extremism must be fought, in all possible peaceful ways, just like all tyrannical
and totalitarian political regimes and ideologies. However, there is one aspect
of this tragic incident of the French weekly, which usually goes unnoticed,
because it is a normal aspect of our times.
Freedom of
expression is undoubtedly one of the consequences of free will and as such
should not be hampered. However, the ideological and religious beliefs are also
expressions of human free will and as such must be respected, as long as they
do not impose a threat to life.
However, what is
found very often in the media is the indiscriminate use of freedom of
expression as a weapon to confront any form of ideology or religion, whose
principles contradict the humanist and materialistic ideology that currently
prevails in the world, especially in the West.
This confrontation
is often offensive, by satire and mockery, which is also a form of disrespect
for individual liberty. Although not threatening human life, this kind of
criticism brings about a sort of moral violence, for some forms of expression
can also be considered as weapons.
Christianity
has been, throughout its history, one of the favorite targets of this critical
violence. Even though many mistakes in the history of the Christian church
deserve to be execrated and criticized, the media often turns its irreverence
and mockery towards aspects of the Christian faith itself. The Christian
principles, even when not fully understood, should be respected as an
expression of religious freedom.
There are
countless times when the human figure of Jesus was outraged, vilified, scorned
and stripped of his divinity, both by the informative media and the
entertainment industry. His role in human history was, many times, reduced to the
one of a simple revolutionary leader; and his behavior compared to the wicked
and ordinary men, and even to perverts. The weekly Charlie Hebdo published in
November 2012, one of its most repulsive charges, satirizing the Holy Trinity.
The fact is
that the Christian faith presents a model of life that reflects the standard of
life expressed by God in the Biblical scriptures, a model that conflicts with
the humanist and materialistic interests that lead the life in this world.
Those who draw
the sword of irreverence refuse to recognize the sovereignty and the divine
omnipotence and are resentful at all forms of constraint and restriction on their
materialistic and hedonist views.
They cannot
bear the anguish of feeling themselves limited in their ego, and recognize their
absolute dependence on a true and living God, of whom nothing can be hidden.
No comments:
Post a Comment